ࡱ>  ~bjbj-- 8*OOp $ $ 8@L pk z||||||,_kkE"E"E"E"zzE"zE"E"{0Ht 2}Ffӆ0}-E"-E"JtE"-$ :   Meeting Report of the Global Ocean Surface Underway Data (GOSUD) Workshop Executive Summary On 4-5 May 2010, the UNESCO/IOC Project Office for IODE situated in Oostende hosted the GOSUD workshop. The main objective of the workshop was to address a comprehensive review of the Project. A significant international presence included representatives from the Environment Canada (Canada), Ifremer & Legos (France), NOAA (USA), INIDEP (Argentina), NIO (India) CSIRO (Australia), MUMM (Belgium), ENEA (Italy), Tohoku University (Japan), AODCJF (Australia). The number of participants was restricted to direct contributors to the Project that could assess the Project and adapt the strategic plan for the coming years. The flowing items were adressed: clarify the data stream enlarge the network of contributors document the quality control procedures and share within the project the QC tools increase the data quality level of the global dataset by focusing on vessels where the acquisition procedures are well known and documented Adopt the strategy for the coming years Meeting Report of the Global Ocean Surface Underway Data (GOSUD) Workshop The GOSUD workshop took place at the UNESCO/IOC Project Office for IODE situated in Oostende, Belgium from 4-5 May 2010. Participants to the meeting are listed in Annex 1. OPENING OF THE SESSION Loic Petit de la Villon, one of the co-chairs of GOSUD, opened the workshop at 0900 on 4 May 2010. He outlined arrangements for the session. He then requested comments on the agenda, received none and consequently it was adopted as presented. Robert Keeley offered to serve as rapporteur. Peter Pissierssens, Director of the IODE Project Office, welcomed participants and offered whatever assistance was required to support a successful meeting. Objectives of the workshop Loic Petit de la Villon outlined objectives for the meeting. He noted that the outcome should be a comprehensive review of the GOSUD project. The review should identify actions to be undertaken to address expectations contained in the most recent GCOS Implementation Plan ( HYPERLINK "http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/index.php" http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/index.php) as well as addressing other issues. He emphasized that discussions should clarify the flow of data to, within, and from the project, identifying priorities and preferences. It is also necessary to enlarge the network of contributors since it is known that more underway data are collected than presently reach the GOSUD project. Priorities on the order to approach contributors should be established. He noted that a common approach to quality control was highly desirable and that perhaps this could be encouraged by agreement on and distribution of common software tools. Finally he noted that Robert Keeley was stepping down as a co-chair, and it was desirable to find someone to take his place. Further discussion of these topics is elaborated in subsequent agenda items. Project Overview Status of the project Loc Petit de la Villon recalled that the GOSUD project began in 2001 and for the first 10 years has focused on assembling together the data that are being collected by various agencies around the world. Data contributors have been ORE (France), NOAA (USA), SeaKeepers Society , and Coriolis, with smaller contributions from the EU MerSea Project. There have also been other irregular contributions from the UK, Australia, Belgium, Japan, and Germany. Canada contributes management of the real-time data stream, and France operates the GDAC Global Data Assembly Centre - . He noted that there had been less success on standardized quality control procedures although work has been done by individual nations such as France and USA. He noted that a large fraction of the data reaching the project (almost 50%) comes via the Global Telecommunications System (GTS). While the reporting of the data is timely, there is a severe lack of metadata which limits the long term value of the observations that arrive from the GTS. The most desirable path to GOSUD is direct contributions because this allows for greater information about the ships collecting the data and the methods used. He also noted that certain vessels report with anonymous call signs. This made it complicated to provide notification if problems were detected, or to know who to talk to for answers to questions that arose in processing the data.This may also be a source of difficulties to manage duplicated data. Finally he noted that although individual countries contributing to GOSUD may have a suite of clients using the data, there was no international list available. This reduced the impact of the project because arguments about the global importance were blunted without such a list. Status of the Network Petit de la Villon reported a number of facts about the GOSUD archives held by the Global Data Assembly Centre in IFREMER: In the first 4 months of 2010 data from 39 vessels were contained in the GDAC. This is in contrast to 2005 when data from 18 vessels were present. In 2009, data from 43 vessels arrived at the GDAC only from the GTS data stream. These data had very limited metadata (as noted before) and limited, automated QC carried out which did not catch some obvious problems, such as positions at 0,0 latitude and longitude. There was significant growth in the number of reports. In 2009, the GDAC has about 1.8 million locations recorded compared to 607000 observations from 2005 At the start of the project it was envisioned that there would be centres with scientific expertise examining the data and providing feedback on the data quality. This has not developed. Likewise, it was hoped to produce a number of products from the data holdings, but these, too, are very limited. Individual countries do have products, but there are few products from GOSUD as a project. Over the last few years, cooperation has been developed between the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS). At present SAMOS operates with US ships and GOSUD is more international in scope. SAMOS has very detailed procedures and very high resolution data compared to those handled by GOSUD. While cooperation has been useful, it has not developed as closely as it might because of the differences in the characteristics of the data streams. Fabienne Gaillard noted that expectations from the science community are that GOSUD will provide a global resource for surface salinity data. Keeley remarked that this was also the expectation to be found in the GCOS Implementation Plan. Participants were informed that many platforms return surface salinity observations and not all of these are presented to GOSUD. For example, the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) oversees a network of moored and drifting buoys, a number of which measure salinity at the surface. Participants accepted that, at least in this instance, GOSUD was better off letting the data assembly systems for DBCP continue to manage such data (rather than copying the data into GOSUD archives). GOSUD should simply ensure that all appropriate archives are referenced when requests for surface salinity or other surface data as appear in GOSUD archives are queried. This leaves unaddressed the question about interoperability of data formats from different data systems (although there is some comment about this later on in discussion of the netCDF format). Participants noted that for delayed mode data there is the desire from users to see documentation on data uncertainties and not just quality flags. Raul Gerrero noted that it is important to be sure the thermosalinograph (TSG) is well maintained in order to get high quality data with low uncertainties. French participants noted that on their research vessels there is a technician monitoring the data collection and that every 6 months the instrument is calibrated. Fabienne Gaillard remarked that it is better to have a few ships reporting high quality data than a wider network with poorer quality. Joaquim Trinanes noted that data collected from US ships pass through automated QC procedure before real-time data distribution. He also noted that surface salinity data in particular is still less commonly collected but will have increasing importance in coastal areas and in addressing carbon flux questions. But coastal regions cause particular difficulties because these are regions where fouling of the TSG is most likely to occur. Action 1: GOSUD website to reference other global archives of in-situ surface salinity observations. Status of the data stream It was noted that data from the SeaKeepers organization have masked call signs which complicates the notification process if problems are encountered but also makes gaining information about the nature of the instruments used more difficult. In at least one case, prompt action was taken to cease reporting of bad data when it was noted in the real-time data stream and notification to SeaKeepers was given. The US NODC has been in discussions with SeaKeepers to gain access to their delayed mode data. While this has not yet happened, there was the feeling that SeaKeepers viewed this to be of higher importance than in the past. Steve Rutz noted that if GOSUD would identify the minimum metadata that was needed to accompany the surface data from SeaKeepers, he would take this list to them and act as the point of contact between SeaKeepers and GOSUD. It was commented that showing the value of close cooperation between SeaKeepers and GOSUD would help to improve communication pathways. Raul Gerrero noted that his institute in Argentina was prepared to provide some calibration facilities to TSG or associated water sample data should any SeaKeepers ships come to the La Plata region. More information about future prospects for increased metadata distribution in real-time will be provided later in agenda item dealing with BUFR. It was noted that more than half of the real-time reports do not provide salinity. Australia noted that they would be starting to send salinity data from their vessels very soon. It was also noted that there is a wide variation in the sampling times of the data reported on the GTS. Some ships report observations at about 2 minute intervals, whereas other ships report only a few times per day. Loc Petit de la Villon wondered about the impact of such large differences on the GOSUD archives. Participants noted that although GOSUD requested collectors report data 4 minutes apart a few years ago, this time was being shortened to a recommended 2 minute sampling. Such very high temporal resolution is not always practical to send in real-time and this just emphasizes the importance of delayed mode or direct submission of data to the GDAC. It was also noted that if higher frequency sampling arrived directly from a contributor, data should be subsampled to 2 minute intervals for insertion into the GDAC archives. Original data, whatever the temporal resolution should be preserved. It was noted that even if there is only automated QC done, ships that consistently report poor values should be placed on a grey list and quickly notified. The point of such a list was to alert users to potential problems in some of the data for certain periods of time. It was commented that perhaps GOSUD needed to establish categories of data reliability for its users. Action 2: Rutz to act as the point of contact between SeaKeepers and GOSUD to inquire about instrumentation used and assist in other queries as possible. Action 3: Rutz to inform SeaKeepers of the offer by Gerrero to provide TSG calibration facilities for vessels stopping in La Plata. Action 4: Gronell-Thresher to report to chairs when salinity data are being reported from Australian vessels. Action 5: Participants to communicate to their TSG operators that the desired sampling interval is now 2 minutes for reporting data to GOSUD but that whatever the original sampling interval, all data should be preserved in national archives. Action 6 : GDAC to implement a grey list with information on ships that report poor values. Report from the GDAC Coriolis Loc Petit de la Villon described the operations at the GDAC in IFREMER. He noted that Coriolis ran the GDAC in France, but that the site was being mirrored by the US NODC. That is, the US did not accept direct submissions for the archives, but simply provided another point of contact to the GDAC holdings through its mirroring process. The GDAC provides web and ftp access to its archives. When data are identified through the web interface, it is possible to receive the data in a few different formats. Over the last few months, there have been about 15-20 hits each month. Report from the global data archive Steve Rutz provided more details on the operations at the US NODC. He noted that they do daily queries of the French GDAC to identify and pull newly updated records. They provide access to the data through ftp, http, OPeNDAP and THREDDS. They are completing automation of data ingest to their archive system and this would include documentation and be completed this year. Steve Rutz also noted that the US NODC archives data coming from the SAMOS program. The data from this system automatically enters NODC archives. At present they have data from 22 vessels reporting at 1 minute intervals. These data include both meteorological and oceanographic measurements and to date these have not been submitted directly to the GDAC. He also remarked that he is pursuing the surface data collected at 30 second intervals on NOAA ships, all data that are collected through the NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration Research, those targeted by the Rolling deck to Repository (R2R) project that is beginning through Scripps, and data from coastal Alaskan and Korean ferries. Rutz agreed to have the NODC act as a consolidation service for US ships (or other vessels for which the data arrive at the NODC) and to forward these data onto the GDAC for inclusion in GOSUD. He noted that there can be many copies of the same data arriving and that this necessitated some form of version control. Keeley remarked that this problem is increasingly recognized as needing both attention and a solution. He wondered if there was some forum where experts could be brought together to discuss problems and solutions. In the meantime, Rutz agreed to keep GOSUD informed of solutions implemented at NODC. Steve Rutz noted, as did others, that other instruments are employed to collect surface observations besides TSGs. Petit de la Villon asked if these other data should also be handled by GOSUD, noting that this question was answered positively in the past, but with concentration on data coming from TSGs. Participants agreed that temperature and salinity data were still the focus, but that if other data arrived at the same time, they should be archived as well. Action 7: Rutz to ensure the US NODC consolidates contributions of surface underway data from national programs for which they coordinates the data assembly, and forwards these data routinely to the GDAC. Action 8: Rutz to inform GOSUD about US solutions to version control. Strategic plan for the project (introduction) Loc Petit de la Villon introduced this item. He challenged the participants to consider whether GOSUD should concentrate on data coming from research vessels, that is from generally well maintained instruments, with good calibrations, or to pay equal attention to data from the wide variety of sources that exist. He also suggested participants consider if it is possible to share the QC task especially because of the very high volume of data coming to the GDAC. He noted that there is a QC manual for real-time data on the GOSUD web site but this describes simple, automated tests that do not satisfy the need for more careful, scientific scrutiny of the data. Further discussion was left to the next day since some of these topics would be treated in other agenda items. Data exchange Loc Petit de la Villon introduced this item. He noted that this section will deal in the future of using the GTS to exchange data in real-time and the impacts of switching to using BUFR for that exchange. He remarked that it seemed desirable to have an assessment of the quality of the global archive already assembled, but that needed significant resources and scientific background to undertake the work. He also remarked that it was his opinion that greater visibility of the archive was needed. Finally he noted that the GOSUD web site was being switched over to a content management system, and this would permit granting privileges to others to update content. Data Format: Adoption of the NetCDF V2 format Data Format: Future evolutions Gael Alory presented work being done to develop a netCDF format for delayed mode GOSUD data. The format is based on that used in Argo, but has extensions and improvements to take into account calibration information, ancillary data, metadata, both raw and adjusted data, and so on. All of these details would shortly be presented on the GOSUD web site and he was seeking reviewers to both comment and to test the adequacy of what was developed. Loc Petit de la Villon noted that the GDAC is now able to distribute data in this format, but that it would continue to support older versions. All participants requested that this new version be clearly marked and documented on the GOSUD web site along with earlier versions. Charles Sun cautioned that changing the format had consequences for reducing interoperability with Argo data. He also remarked that the CF convention does not appear to be followed. This spawned a more detailed discussion about what it meant to be CF compliant. At present CF compliance means that a netCDF file uses a standard_name for each variable. The parameter name may be whatever is wanted as this is not standardized by CF. Participants agreed that where there were common parameters reported by Argo, GTSPP and GOSUD, that the same name should be used to promote interoperability. It also agreed that CF standard_names be used. Charles Sun agreed to work with Thierry Carval to ensure the new format met these criteria. This latter discussion brought up the question about how to define what is a surface salinity. Robert Keeley reminded the meeting of the extensive work done by the GHRSST project on defining SST. It was decided that rather than try to mimic the process undertaken by GHRSST and because, in any case, it is important to know where the salinity measurement is collected, GOSUD should call its measurements as salinity rather than surface salinity and that it was necessary to include the depth at which the water was sampled. It was also decided that uncertainties be placed on this depth to alert users if the information is not well defined. All of this must be represented in the netCDF format and be verified by Sun and Carval. The discussion then turned to a more general consideration of data distribution issues. The GDAC explained that they were providing a daily updated file broken into separate calendar months for SMOS validation. They also described the directory structure and file contents for real-time and for delayed mode (a cruise by cruise presentation). They were still coming to grips with the definition of a cruise since this is not always so straightforward to determine. There was lots of discussion about which of these directories and files are the master copy and therefore the files that need to be mirrored at the US NODC. The meeting concluded that file and content management at the GDAC is their responsibility. Participants further agreed that the GDAC is tasked to provide the most up-to-date, highest quality and resolution data available at the time of a request. How they do this is their own business. Participants emphasized that the best copy of the data should contain the best and most complete metadata as well. They asked the US NODC and the GDAC to resolve the question about what files needed to be mirrored and to provide appropriate documentation for the GOSUD web site. Action 9: Alory to notify participants when the documentation of the new netCDF format was available on the GOSUD web site and participants to provide feedback. Action 10: Carval and Sun to check that the new netCDF format uses consistent parameter names between Argo, GTSPP and GOSUD and that CF compliant standard_names are used. Action 11: Petit de la Villon and Rutz to agree on what are the appropriate files to mirror at the US NODC and to explain this on the GOSUD website. Role of GTS within the project, BUFR format Joaquim Trinanes introduced the participants to the changing rules for data exchange on the GTS. By 2012, WMO expects to have converted the transmission of all data from Traditional Alphanumeric Codes (TACs) to Table Driven Codes (TDCs). For oceanography, that means all data will be sent in the BUFR format. BUFR is a very flexible code form. But because of this flexibility, it is complicated to prepare software for decoding that can respond to all possible content. To ease this, templates are written. These templates are effectively a list of the information to be sent in each BUFR message. All fields in the template must be filled, either with real information or a fill value. Robert Keeley informed the meeting that templates presently exist for all existing TACs that carry oceanographic data. However, there are both inconsistencies in how the same variables are reported from one form to another, and the details of metadata are widely different. JCOMM created a Task Team to address this issue presently lead by Keeley. He presented preliminary results related to encoding underway surface data in a new BUFR template. The meeting asked to be kept informed of progress. Action 12: Keeley to keep GOSUD informed of new template developments. Metadata Fabienne Gaillard recalled that observations without information (metadata) about how those observations were collected may strongly limit their subsequent use. She suggested that it would be helpful to build a list of what metadata was crucial especially in real-time data exchange. Keeley noted that this was relevant to the development of new templates and invited participants to inform him of their suggestions. Petit de la Villon stated that he would ask France to take a first attempt to generate such a list of minimum metadata and then circulate this to participants. Action 13: Petit de la Villon will provide an initial list of important metadata to accompany data and circulate to GOSUD partners. Data Quality Assessment Processing tools available IRD processing tools Others. Possible distribution of tools Gael Alory informed the meeting of the data processing tools employed in IRD. The application is written in Matlab and uses the ASCII format as provided by French ships. It has a visual component that permits manual flagging of portions of the records. It runs some automatic quality tests but can also display data from climatologies, from water samples taken from the TSG, include Argo float data and permits manual flagging and adjustments if warranted. Alory offered the software to interested parties with documentation presently available in French but soon in English as well. Joaquim Trinanes described software used at AOML for the same purpose. Their version consisted mostly of automated tests that are run on the data before forwarding to the GTS. Quality of the data Reports from National Data centres Ann Gronell-Thresher reported on behalf of Ed Butler from Australia. She noted that most of the data collected by Australia came from relatively short run cruises of research ships and some from ferries. These data are available through the Australian IMOS system. She remarked that some ships carry other sensors but that these data cannot presently be distributed in real-time because of limitations of the TACs. She offered to put Butler (or another appropriate contact) in touch with the GDAC to agree on a mutually acceptable format for delayed mode/direct data submission. Serge Scory described the collections undertaken by Belgium. He noted that their observations are from a restricted area off the coast of Belgium. However, observations from the ship Belgica had been contributed regularly for many years except for a recent hiatus, recently restarted. The TSG samples every 10 minutes and the data are sent by email on a daily schedule. They had not been inserting data onto the GTS, but were prepared to do so if requested. The meeting requested that they do so. Joaquim Trinanes reported on activities in the US carried out by NOAA. He noted that 11 ships contribute more than 1.5 million observations each year although about 50% report temperature only. Data are sent to AOML as zipped files in email, are processed, subsampled to 3 minute intervals and sent onto the GTS and directly to the GDAC. They use automatic tools to check data quality for real-time distribution and additional tools are used to examine the delayed mode version which is stored at AOML. Web pages for AOML provide details of their processing system, access to the data and products as well. They already have the capability to report data using the existing BUFR template for underway data n the bulletin IOSX01. Raul Gerrero reported on behalf of Argentina. They presently have about 10 years of historical data and through funding provided by an Aquarius validation experiment, are now putting in place applications that will allow them to develop a complete TSG processing system. They operate 2 ships about 400 days a year from the shelf areas off Argentina. They take water samples and coincident CTD data as a further comparison to TSG measurements. In support of the Aquarius work, they will be providing surface salinity observations each month. They also collect nutrients, fluorometry, oxygen and turbidity. Once their systems are running they will contact the GDAC to arrange to submit the historical archive as well as ongoing observations. This is expected to occur this calendar year. France reported that 12 merchant vessels are operated by Observatoire de Recherche pour lEnvironment ORE SSS- led by IRD. Two people are devoted to maintain the TSGs and the network. They also have 6 research vessels operating TSGs with automatic systems and 2 more vessels are expected to be likewise equipped by June 2010. All of the data collected by these ships are sent to the GDAC. Action 14: Scory to arrange for real-time submission of TSG data collected by the Belgica. Action 15: Gerrero to contact GDAC to arrange transfer of historical TSG data as well as newly collected data once their processing systems are in place. Distribution of the Quality control tasks Loc Petit de la Villon remarked that GOSUD had been operating for about 10 years and it was evident that the level of data quality in the archive was variable. First, about 50% of the data come from the GTS, are captured by Canada and sent on to the GDAC with no QC done. It was evident that there are significant errors in these data and this needed attention. Apart from that, there is automatic testing of the data that arrive through direct submission. But it is known that automatic tests can catch only the worst errors and that others pass through undetected. His desire is to pass the entire archive through a comprehensive review of quality. He noted that this task had been the expected role for science centres but since GOSUD has no participating science centres, this is undone. He also remarked that the size of the task is too large for the GDAC to undertake alone. Thierry Carval noted that the automatic tests must be done quickly to meet time delivery constraints. However, visual checks are still needed. He suggested that a global view of the data set, such as provided by the technique of Optimum Interpolation (OI), might be helpful (see notes later under item Products). A number of ideas were voiced including asking originating contributors to QC data before submission, to use OI as a quick look, and classify data reliability based on how well sources are known. Tests such as comparing vessel to vessel observations, climatological tests, and spike detection might be worthwhile as well. There already exists a QC manual for real-time, but nothing for the work that could be done in delayed mode. Raul Gerrero noted that his country is strongly interested in the SW Atlantic so perhaps he could volunteer to deal with data from that region. It was noted, though, that unless there are agreed procedures, GOSUD risked having different tests applied on different subsets of the data and this defeats the objective of a uniform quality treatment. Loc Petit de la Villon volunteered to summarize the documentation for the real-time tests and delayed mode. He would develop a framework for a more extensive manual, and make some suggestions about tools that could be employed. Alory once more offered the French application to anyone wishing to use it. Trinanes offered to evaluate and comment on the application. He also noted that procedures used by AOML are documented on their web site and should be taken into consideration in the compilation being done. Since metadata are an important component in QC, Petit de la Villon will include the minimum list of metadata needed as a part of the draft manual. This will be prepared by September 2010, posted to the GOSUD web site and participants notified. Action 16: Petit de la Villon to prepare the framework of a QC manual consolidating existing tests, suggesting other tests and possible common tools. This would also include the minimum metadata required (see action 12). This will be posted on the GOSUD web site by September 2010 Action 17: Trinanes to evaluate and provide comments on the IRD QC application Data Users Science users There was no representative for the science community and so this was not discussed. Satellite validation Fabienne Gaillard described the contribution of surface salinity observations to calibration and validation of the SMOS satellite launched in November 2009 and commissioned in May 2010. This is being conducted under the Global Ocean sea surface Salinity CALibration for SMOS (GLOSCAL) Project. The project is funded by CNES and has members of the in-situ and satellite communities. The work of the in-situ group is to develop surface salinity climatology and databases and, estimate large scale variability. The SMOS satellite has produced some initial maps of surface salinity and these are being compared to monthly gridded results from in-situ. So far, the comparison is reasonably good. Argo data at 3 m are also being incorporated. There are plans to undertake a re-analysis of the data in about 6 months. Operational Oceanography Loc Petit de la Villon informed the meeting that TSG data from the GDAC are used in validation of the first guess fields input to an operational oceanographic model run in France. The outputs of the model are being provided to GLOSCAL and it is expected the same will be done for the Aquarius mission. The data are produced each day and will be placed on the GOSUD web site for others to use. New contributions Enlarging the network Vissa Gopalakrishna informed the meeting of the strong XBT program operating in India. This is complemented by 2 vessels that operate TSGs as well as a strong coastal water sampling program. Support for the program is strong because studies link the size and timing of the surface freshwater exported from the Bay of Bengal to the Arabian Sea with impacts on the character of the monsoons. The coastal stations collect water samples every 3 days and this has been operating since May 2005. He offered to send these data to GOSUD. When asked about quality control procedures, he replied that there is no documentation available. The introduction of such coastal observations caused discussions to broaden. Trinanes emphasized the importance of such coastal measurements in particular to HABS studies and the carbon communities. Gerrero agreed on the importance of coastal measurements. Gopalakrishna noted that he did not know if data from Sri Lankan coastal waters were collected or available, but this would be of strong interest. It was suggested that he could contact IOGOOS. Keeley raised the question about the salinity data collected by some coastal tide gauge installations and whether this was attractive to GOSUD to handle. Carval noted that the MyOcean program was looking into handling such data and that GOSUD should watch what they do and learn from their experience. Petit de la Villon expressed his desire to continue to focus on underway data but to accept other data collected in a similar fashion. These would help in validation and calibration of TSG data and be especially useful in coastal waters. Action 18: Gopalakrishna to contact the GDAC to arrange the submission of TSG and coastal water sample data. Cruises or sailing ships Loc Petit de la Villon described an experimental program in France that equipped both racing and cruising sailboats with TSGs. The system operated as a data logger that would allow data downloads in delayed mode only. So far results looked to be reliable. A first major test will be conducted from Alaska to Tahiti in June of this year. If this proceeds well, there are plans to add real-time transmission. He noted that the measurements of surface salinity were very close to the surface (~1 m) and appeared to be very good. The 4MyPlanet program is also testing TSGs collected using a SBE45 system. The cruising sailing vessel is now at sea and data are being sent ashore daily. Water samples are also being collected and these will be analyzed to compare against the TSG measurements. The meeting was encouraged to hear of these efforts and encouraged these to continue. Research vessels: the EU project Eurofleet Loc Petit de la Villon described the Eurofleets program. This has the objective to optimize the use of European research vessels and to pursue common strategies for development, fleet deployment, interoperability and ship design. It impacts operations of 24 marine institutes and universities from 16 countries. It is funded at 7 million euros over 3 years. Coriolis is tasked to deliver common tools for managing data from XBTs, TSGs and in near real-time. There is also a work component to deliver cruise information to shore in a common way. Serge Scory remarked that Belgium is working on standardizing provision of metadata about each cruise. He invited participants to provide their comments. Products Mathieu Ouellet showed some work that he has been doing using OI. He showed the impact of the inclusion of surface salinity data by comparing results with and without data from underway vessels. There was a significant impact in reducing variance associated with vessel tracks when underway data are used. He also remarked that the anomaly maps are a convenient way to spot undetected problems in the data. Petit de la Villon asked if he had also used the data directly submitted to the GDAC; he had not. They will start a discussion about how to do the same analysis with all of the GDAC data, not just those reported in real-time. Carval noted that if errors are found, they should be reported back to the GDAC so that the archive can be improved. Action 19: Ouellet and Petit de la Villon to discuss how to incorporate directly submitted data at the GDAC to the OI procedures, and explore their use in QC. GOSUD visibility Loc Petit de la Villon noted that he had attended a number of meetings where he had been describing GOSUD. These included presentations at JCOMM SOT, IODE-20, OceanObs09 and IMDIS-2010. In addition, Thierry Delcroix presented GOSUD in a recent meeting in Geneva. Petit de la Villon noted that IMDIS reviewers allocated poster space but not presentation time because they did not perceive that there was a significant change between the last session and the present one. Keeley remarked that GOSUD is explicitly noted in the GCOS Implementation Plan in Action O15: Develop programme for in situ observations of sea-surface salinity. The action is to Develop a robust programme to observe sea-surface salinity to include VOS ships, research ships, reference moorings, and drifting buoys. This should be done in cooperation with national services and ocean research programmes through IODE and JCOMM in collaboration with CLIVAR. He recommended that progress towards this general objective should be measurable and reported at every opportunity. GOSUD web site Loc Petit de la Villon noted that maintaining the GOSUD web site was becoming difficult. He plans to change over to a content management system which will allow sharing the updating of content among a few partners. He will circulate the framework of existing components of the web site for review. Thierry Delcroix and Keeley offered to review the content, to suggest updates or changes and also suggest how to share management of the content. Action 20: Petit de la Villon to distribute the framework of the existing web site, and Delcroix and Keeley to comment on content and update strategies Strategic plan for the project (continued and adoption) This item was revisited to see if there were further remarks. Participants noted again that any delayed mode QC done on data that had already been sent by direct submission to the GDAC should be resubmitted so that the GDAC would have a best copy of all data. It was also re-iterated that barring any progress on science centre contributions to reviewing QC of the archives, the project would need to wait for re-analyses or the OI projects to provide guidance. Conclusions 13.1 Review of the actions identified during the workshop These are incorporated into the report after each item where they arise. Unless noted otherwise, actions are expected to be completed by the next GOSUD meeting. 13.2 New steering team or chair / co-chair Robert Keeley reminded the meeting that he was stepping down as co-chair. It was desirable to have co-chairs for GOSUD because this was a way to share the work of running the project, that it could balance data management and scientific backgrounds and could bring leaders of national programs to provide international guidance. Participants were asked to consider names of suitable candidates and to provide these to both Robert Keeley and Loc Petit de la Villon as soon as possible. Action 21: Participants to provide Petit de la Villon with possible names of a co-chair to take over from Keeley Closing of the session The session closed at 12:45 PM on May 4. Annex 1: GOSUD Workshop Participants Greg Reed , AODCJF, Australia, greg@metoc.gov.au Peter Pissierssens, IOC Project Office for IODE,Ostende,Belgium,p.pissierssens@unesco.org Raul Guerrero, INIDEP, INIDEP, Argentina, raul.guerrero@inidep.edu.ar Joaquin Trinanes, NOAA, United States Joaquin.Trinanes@noaa.gov Vissa Gopalakrishna , NIO, India, gopal@darya.nio.org Norm Hall, US-NODC, NOAA, United States Norman.Hall@noaa.gov Mei-Lin Chen, US-NODC, NOAA, United States  HYPERLINK "mailto:%4d%65%69%6c%69%6e.%43%68%65%6e@%6e%6f%61%61.%67%6f%76" Meilin.Chen@noaa.gov Bob Keeley, DFO, Canada, Robert.Keeley@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Gael Alory,  HYPERLINK "http://listes.ifremer.fr/sympa/editsubscriber/gosud/gael.alory@legos.obs-mip.fr/review" gael.alory@legos.obs-mip.fr Fabienne Gaillard,LPO, Ifremer, France, Fabienne.Gaillard@ifremer.fr Steve Rutz, US-NODC, NOAA, United States ,steven.rutz@noaa.gov Thierry Carval, Ifremer, France, Thierry.Carval@ifremer.fr L. Charles Sun, US-NODC, NOAA, United States, Charles.sun@noaa.gov Ann Gronell-Thresher, CSIR, Australia, ann.thresher@csiro.au Shoichi Kizu, Tohoku University,  HYPERLINK "mailto:%6b%69%7a%75@%70%6f%6c.%67%70.%74%6f%68%6f%6b%75.%61%63.%6a%70" kizu@pol.gp.tohoku.ac.jp Serge Scory, MUMM, Belgium, s.scoryt@mumm.ac.be Franco Reseghetti, ENEA, Italy,franco.reseghetti@enea.it Mathieu Ouellet, DFO, Canada,  HYPERLINK "mailto:%6d%61%74%68%69%65%75.%6f%75%65%6c%6c%65%74@%64%66%6f-%6d%70%6f.%67%63.%63%61" mathieu.ouellet@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Tim Boyer , OCL/ US-NODC, NOAA, United States, Tim.Boyer@noaa.gov Loc Petit de la Villon, Sismer, Ifremer, France,  HYPERLINK "mailto:Loic.Petit.De.La.Villeon@ifremer.fr" Loic.Petit.De.La.Villeon@ifremer.fr Annex 2: Action Summary Action 1: GOSUD website to reference other global archives of in-situ surface salinity observations. Action 2: Rutz to act as the point of contact between SeaKeepers and GOSUD to inquire about instrumentation used and assist in other queries as possible. Action 3: Rutz to inform SeaKeepers of the offer by Gerrero to provide TSG calibration facilities for vessels stopping in La Plata. Action 4: Gronell-Thresher to report to chairs when salinity data are being reported from Australian vessels. Action 5: Participants to communicate to their TSG operators that the desired sampling interval is now 2 minutes for reporting data to GOSUD but that whatever the original sampling interval, all data should be preserved in national archives. Action 6 : GDAC to implement a grey list with information on ships that report poor values. Action 7: Rutz to ensure the US NODC consolidates contributions of surface underway data from national programs for which they coordinates the data assembly, and forwards these data routinely to the GDAC. Action 8: Rutz to inform GOSUD about US solutions to version control. Action 9: Alory to notify participants when the documentation of the new netCDF format was available on the GOSUD web site and participants to provide feedback. Action 10: Carval and Sun to check that the new netCDF format uses consistent parameter names between Argo, GTSPP and GOSUD and that CF compliant standard_names are used. Action 11: Petit de la Villon and Rutz to agree on what are the appropriate files to mirror at the US NODC and to explain this on the GOSUD website. Action 12: Keeley to keep GOSUD informed of new template developments. Action 13: Petit de la Villon will provide an initial list of important metadata to accompany data and circulate to GOSUD partners. Action 14: Scory to arrange for real-time submission of TSG data collected by the Belgica. Action 15: Gerrero to contact GDAC to arrange transfer of historical TSG data as well as newly collected data once their processing systems are in place. Action 16: Petit de la Villon to prepare the framework of a QC manual consolidating existing tests, suggesting other tests and possible common tools. This would also include the minimum metadata required (see action 12). This will be posted on the GOSUD web site by September 2010 Action 17: Trinanes to evaluate and provide comments on the IRD QC application Action 18: Gopalakrishna to contact the GDAC to arrange the submission of TSG and coastal water sample data. Action 19: Ouellet and Petit de la Villon to discuss how to incorporate directly submitted data at the GDAC to the OI procedures, and explore their use in QC. Action 20: Petit de la Villon to distribute the framework of the existing web site, and Delcroix and Keeley to comment on content and update strategies Action 21: Participants to provide Petit de la Villon with possible names of a co-chair to take over from Keeley     9:;@AJKL_t"  , - * + R | } ~ 1 2 򛗓~~mihe hehnCJOJQJ^JaJ hnhnCJOJQJ^JaJhEh=hnh=CJOJQJ^JaJheCJOJQJ^JaJhf005OJQJ^Jh{aCJOJQJ^JaJ h3 hf00CJOJQJ^JaJ hhf00CJOJQJ^JaJhf00CJOJQJ^JaJ"KL^_" -  + } 2 3  . / 0 G & F7$8$H$gd1gd)gd3 $a$gd3  & F gdngdf00$a$gdf002 3 4 J m n o t u  , - / 0 F G L _ ;Ah±ӣӄseTFh+/CJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh1CJOJQJ^JaJ hh1CJOJQJ^JaJ hh)CJOJQJ^JaJhT*CJOJQJ^JaJh_ _CJOJQJ^JaJ h3 h3 CJOJQJ^JaJ hh3 CJOJQJ^JaJh3 CJOJQJ^JaJhf00CJOJQJ^JaJ hf00hf00CJOJQJ^JaJhi!"#(;<a256BлwbQC1C#jh{aCJOJQJU^JaJh{aCJOJQJ^JaJ h_ _hBCJOJQJ^JaJ(hXhBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "hO#CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hUFCJOJQJ^JaJ"h1CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h+/CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hXhMCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  hh_ _CJOJQJ^JaJh_ _CJOJQJ^JaJ h_ _h_ _CJOJQJ^JaJG "#I@ & F7$8$H$gdpg 7$8$H$gdpg & F7$8$H$gd{F 7$8$H$gd{a & F7$8$H$gd{a & F7$8$H$gd1 7$8$H$gd_ _Bnpqr<Jcpy/8ɷᖈzlzz^M hhMCJOJQJ^JaJh7CJOJQJ^JaJhO#CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhUFCJOJQJ^JaJh_ _CJOJQJ^JaJ$hh{a0JCJOJQJ^JaJ#jh{aCJOJQJU^JaJ/jhh{aCJOJQJU^JaJh{aCJOJQJ^JaJ h{ah{aCJOJQJ^JaJ'/Eiq!"#ᴣyhhhyhyyyhhhyyyyy hUFhpgCJOJQJ^JaJh=CJOJQJ^JaJhpgCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJhO#CJOJQJ^JaJh{FCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJh{aCJOJQJ^JaJ hh1CJOJQJ^JaJ( '*+XQR:elm򷦘ykkkkZHk#hO#B*CJOJQJ^JaJph h#hO#CJOJQJ^JaJh8pCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh(1CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ h_ _hpgCJOJQJ^JaJhO#CJOJQJ^JaJh=CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhpgCJOJQJ^JaJ  x!!!!""####S$\$g$s$$$$$$%%%6%9%ββܖzzzzizz hhCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJh`CJOJQJ^JaJhO#CJOJQJ^JaJhw5CJOJQJ^JaJhkBCJOJQJ^JaJhnCJOJQJ^JaJhcCJOJQJ^JaJhpgCJOJQJ^JaJ)h8phpgB*CJOJQJ^JaJph)@  %%.)/))))))X.Y...-3.34 7$8$H$gd & F JJ7$8$H$^J`gd-_ h7$8$H$^hgd 7$8$H$gdT* 7$8$H$gdpg & F7$8$H$gdpg9%%%%&&&L&U&a&&&''"'''y''())-).)/)5)7))))Ⱥ򬚋}iR, *hVPh7B*CJOJQJ^JaJph& *h(1B*CJOJQJ^JaJphhT*CJOJQJ^JaJhyE5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hXhT*5CJOJQJ^JaJhHCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhyCJOJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJ^JaJhw5CJOJQJ^JaJ)))))**8*R*U*+G++, ,,',(,.,,,--------....k///{m{_{{hEaCJOJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJ^JaJhXCJOJQJ^JaJhO#CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhuCJOJQJ^JaJh\CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ#hB*CJOJQJ^JaJphh(1CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ#//x0}00000031C12244444@5A5B5H5ŷ䘆wfXJX8#hXhX5CJOJQJ^JaJhuCJOJQJ^JaJhXCJOJQJ^JaJ huhuCJOJQJ^JaJhyE5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hXhu5CJOJQJ^JaJ huh(oCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhyECJOJQJ^JaJ44A5B5555666(7)77777999::;;> 7$8$H$gdi 7$8$H$gdh 7$8$H$gd & F JJ7$8$H$^J`gdC 7$8$H$gdO# 7$8$H$gd(oH5J555555666>666'7(7)7/7172777ⱟr`Q`C2 huhO#CJOJQJ^JaJhO#CJOJQJ^JaJhO#5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hyEhO#5CJOJQJ^JaJhuCJOJQJ^JaJ huhyECJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJ#hyEhyE5CJOJQJ^JaJhyECJOJQJ^JaJ hyEhyECJOJQJ^JaJ#hXhX5CJOJQJ^JaJhXCJOJQJ^JaJhyE5CJOJQJ^JaJ7777777777777F8H8Q9R9k9s9999ͼ{m{m{_m_m_Q_{<)hhh{FB*CJOJQJ^JaJphhk CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhCCJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hChBCJOJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJ^JaJ h7hCJOJQJ^JaJ h7h(1CJOJQJ^JaJ h7h (CJOJQJ^JaJ huh7CJOJQJ^JaJ9:::::::4:T:z:{:}:::::::;;;;<<3=T=_=====>>8>>>????@!@@@@@@@ŷũũũũũśũũ| hlhlCJOJQJ^JaJhlCJOJQJ^JaJh&~CJOJQJ^JaJh&pCJOJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJ^JaJhiCJOJQJ^JaJh(1CJOJQJ^JaJh{FCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ0>>@@sBtBACBCCCCCCFFFFFoIpIqI 7$8$H$gdx" 7$8$H$gd(1 7$8$H$gdb~H & F7$8$H$gd(1 7$8$H$gd7 7$8$H$^gd(1 7$8$H$gdi@@A(A)AAAABBBBBsBtB{B|B*C3CBCICJCCCCCCCwfXhb~HCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hh7CJOJQJ^JaJh(1CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h&~h&~5CJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJhlCJOJQJ^JaJh&~CJOJQJ^JaJCCCCC-DLDMDODoDpDDDDEERFYFFFFFFFFįttcQ?"h(1CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h7CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hh(1CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhb~HCJOJQJ^JaJh7CJOJQJ^JaJ hb~Hhb~HCJOJQJ^JaJ(hb~Hhb~HCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hb~HhBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hXhBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH FFFFFGGGGH9HSHiHnIoIpIqIIIǵzzfR=/h^CJOJQJ^JaJ(hhMCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH & *h:*B*CJOJQJ^JaJph& *hx"B*CJOJQJ^JaJphh:*CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhx"CJOJQJ^JaJ hx"hx"CJOJQJ^JaJ"hBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hXhBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h~CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "hx"CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH qIIIILLpOqOPRQR$T%TVVWWGXHXXXX 7$8$H$gd& p7$8$H$gdo 7$8$H$gdx" & F JJ7$8$H$^J`gd:*IIIIIIIJJJNJTJiJrJwJJJJJJKK|KKKKKK LLLLL^MfMFNRNOOŷũũũśũśō|n``ōhX`-CJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJhu&HCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhxCJOJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJ^JaJhx"CJOJQJ^JaJhACJOJQJ^JaJh:*CJOJQJ^JaJ hhACJOJQJ^JaJ%O4Oa?aDaŷtctctcUD6h4LCJOJQJ^JaJ hhqjCJOJQJ^JaJh^CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hh^CJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hh5CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhACJOJQJ^JaJhdCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJaa>a?acc9d:d;dOdrdsdffhhkknn 7$8$H$gd;a 7$8$H$gd . & F 7$8$H$^gd 7$8$H$gd^ 7$8$H$gdqj 7$8$H$gd & F ``7$8$H$^`gdDa^a$bCbbbbccc:d;dOdgdqdrdsdwddd6eUeVeWedene,fMffff4gAg䬛|nnnnnn`nRRh; CJOJQJ^JaJhgmGCJOJQJ^JaJh .CJOJQJ^JaJh^CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hh^CJOJQJ^JaJhYCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhqjCJOJQJ^JaJhT``CJOJQJ^JaJ AgQgRg~ggggghhh*j-j8jEjjjk8k>kKkOkYk\kkkkkn&nYnennnnnnnnnnoopp%pȺ֩֩ȺțȩȊȊȊx#hh5CJOJQJ^JaJ h;ah;aCJOJQJ^JaJhfYcCJOJQJ^JaJ h; h;aCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJh;aCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJh; CJOJQJ^JaJ,nppxpypqqq?q@qttuuww{{}}^}_}`} 7$8$H$gdM 7$8$H$gdEa 7$8$H$gdfYc & F7$8$H$gdfYc 7$8$H$gd . 7$8$H$gd;a%p&pwpxpypppqqq>q?q@qEqXqYqrrlsws}ssssssttttƴƣƇvhZLZLZLZLZLZLZh4BMCJOJQJ^JaJhEaCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ#hfYchfYc5CJOJQJ^JaJhfYcCJOJQJ^JaJh;aCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJt u/u0u1uUutuuuuuuuuqvuv~vvvvww(w0wwwpxuxxyyysyzy.{A{B{{{{{|ֺֺ֩zi h4BMh4BMCJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h4BMh4BM5CJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJh&CJOJQJ^JaJh4BMCJOJQJ^JaJhEaCJOJQJ^JaJ)|}}}]}^}_}`}j}k}l}s}y}z}{}}}}}}}~~||n`nR`A`` hhCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJh^CJOJQJ^JaJ hhVgCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hh^CJOJQJ^JaJ h4BMhEaCJOJQJ^JaJ h4BMh4BMCJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h4BMh4BM5CJOJQJ^JaJh4BMCJOJQJ^JaJ`}l}z}{}}}}}}/0 7$8$H$gdGk' & F 7$8$H$^gdGk' h7$8$H$^hgd^ 7$8$H$gd 7$8$H$gd4BM & F 7$8$H$^gd4BM & F7$8$H$gdM 12-./05HI±~pbQChBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJh^CJOJQJ^JaJ hh/CJOJQJ^JaJ hh^CJOJQJ^JaJ h/th^CJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJ hhCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJ hGk'hGk'CJOJQJ^JaJI΂ςq{=A[k*3VoL_±£ykyyyZ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhR4CJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hT``hGk'CJOJQJ^JaJhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJhT``CJOJQJ^JaJ!ςZ[;<ĉʼnՋ֋234_` 7$8$H$gd} 7$8$H$gd 7$8$H$gd&[- 7$8$H$gd 7$8$H$gdGk' & F 8hh7$8$H$^hgdGk' & F 7$8$H$gdRv\_`ˈ҈:;<DEÉĉʼnʉ݉މȨȺseWF8hCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ)h~\h8%B*CJOJQJ^JaJphhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hGk'hGk'5CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhR4CJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ6D@_`aq(0134^_`exy䳢p[F(hVhBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hXhBCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "h4LCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH "hGk'CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ)h~\h}B*CJOJQJ^JaJphhk CJOJQJ^JaJhVCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJyҍۍGLavy ()*2 ھھ̢̰̾̾ڐn`RRRRhwRCJOJQJ^JaJhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJ#huxB*CJOJQJ^JaJphhk CJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJhVCJOJQJ^JaJ hVhVCJOJQJ^JaJ(hVhVCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  )*‘Γϓ((gdZX  7$8$H$^ gdZX  7$8$H$^ gdwR & F R7$8$H$^`Rgd-_  7$8$H$^ gdGk' 7$8$H$gdV >Zv}‘Ց֑#$mv“͓ΓϓŷwfwwUGhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hGk'hk CJOJQJ^JaJ hGk'hGk'CJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hGk'hGk'5CJOJQJ^JaJh]RCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJhwRCJOJQJ^JaJhGk'CJOJQJ^JaJϓԓ*4KXٔɕӕ ŷũŷŘŇvŷ_K_&hZXB*CJOJQJ\^JaJph,hZXhZXB*CJOJQJ\^JaJph hZXhk CJOJQJ^JaJ hZXhZXCJOJQJ^JaJ hBh}CJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJh}CJOJQJ^JaJhZXCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJ (LMax{ȗϻn\J5)hA,fh}B*CJOJQJ^JaJph#h&[-B*CJOJQJ^JaJph#hk B*CJOJQJ^JaJph#h}B*CJOJQJ^JaJph#hZXB*CJOJQJ^JaJph)hZXhZXB*CJOJQJ^JaJph&hZXB*CJOJQJ\^JaJph&h}B*CJOJQJ\^JaJph,hZXhZXB*CJOJQJ\^JaJph2hZXhZX6B*CJOJQJ\]^JaJphVWX_`a 7$8$H$gd  7$8$H$^ gd;2 & F R7$8$H$^`Rgd-_  7$8$H$^ gd} 7$8$H$gdRv\ 7$8$H$gd} & F HH7$8$H$^Hgd} 7$8$H$gd&[-,-*1ęƙVWXŷŊŊxiXG9hRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ h}h}CJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h}h}5CJOJQJ^JaJhZXCJOJQJ^JaJhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJh}CJOJQJ^JaJhMCJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJÚĚܚ>@:>M]_`alrIJKLQvwxҽ|n`n`nn䛬|hk CJOJQJ^JaJhT*CJOJQJ^JaJhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hh]CJOJQJ^JaJ hhRv\CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ)hA,fh}B*CJOJQJ^JaJph#h B*CJOJQJ^JaJphh}CJOJQJ^JaJh;2CJOJQJ^JaJ#amJKLwx_`ҟӟԟ=>? 7$8$H$gd$ 7$8$H$gdRv\ 7$8$H$gd;2 7$8$H$gd} & F R7$8$H$^`Rgd}xɝҝ&16IJ_`giҟӟԟ䗅veeTFh^CJOJQJ^JaJ hhMCJOJQJ^JaJ h}h}CJOJQJ^JaJhy5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h}h}5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h}B*CJOJQJ^JaJphhBCJOJQJ^JaJ hBhBCJOJQJ^JaJhk CJOJQJ^JaJh}CJOJQJ^JaJh;2CJOJQJ^JaJh4LCJOJQJ^JaJ=>?J]pʠrġҡɻvccJcccv1h#h B*CJOJQJ^JaJmHphsH$h#h 0JCJOJQJ^JaJ(h#h CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  h#h=CJOJQJ^JaJ h#h CJOJQJ^JaJh_ _CJOJQJ^JaJh3 CJOJQJ^JaJh h3 OJQJ^Jh}CJOJQJ^JaJh;2CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ?pʠQġR[գVO2ŦǦȦF 7$8$H$gd 7$8$H$gd$gd ;<PQR]j[dwxˤ̤OmnХѥ2eխխ꘭p]՘꘭$h#h 0JCJOJQJ^JaJ h#h=CJOJQJ^JaJ,h#h 0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h#h CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  h#h CJOJQJ^JaJ,h#h 0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (h#h CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH )jh#h CJOJQJU^JaJ"efæĦŦƦǦȦFѵ扁vdSA0 h h CJOJQJ^JaJ"h CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  h h OJQJ^JmH sH "hECJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hzhmH sH hmH sH (h#h CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH ,h#h0JCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 7jAh#hCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH (h#hCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 1jh#hCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH  FGHgh֨רɩʩ()=>߫"#jk p7$8$H$gd 7$8$H$^gd 7$8$H$gd h7$8$H$^hgd FHpqstvwyz}~h_jh_U h h CJOJQJ^JaJ, *h h B*CJOJQJ^JaJph kLMRSabnoprsuvx 7$8$H$gd$  7$8$H$^ gd h7$8$H$^hgd 7$8$H$gd xy{|}~ 7$8$H$gd$6&P1h:pw/ =!"#$% ADyK -http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/index.phpyK rhttp://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/index.phpyX;H,]ą'cDyK $Loic.Petit.De.La.Villeon@ifremer.fryK Vmailto:Loic.Petit.De.La.Villeon@ifremer.fr6666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH J@J @i Heading 3$<@&5\^JaJDA`D Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List ROR (abstractdhx5$7$8$9DH$ aJmHsHV>@V (Title$<@&a$5CJ KHOJQJ\^JaJ (/(}1Stage F(!(YTANNEX F@@@ YTTOC 1 xx[$ 5;\aJ>@B> GV Footnote TextCJaJ@&Q@ GVFootnote ReferenceH*,a, ,V contact_use@r HTML Preformatted7 2( Px 4 #\'*.25@9 CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH tH 6U@6 {a Hyperlink >*B*phH@H O# Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ.X@.  Emphasis6]PK!pO[Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢]yl#!MB;.n̨̽\A1&ҫ QWKvUbOX#&1`RT9<l#$>r `С-;c=1g~'}xPiB$IO1Êk9IcLHY<;*v7'aE\h>=^,*8q;^*4?Wq{nԉogAߤ>8f2*<")QHxK |]Zz)ӁMSm@\&>!7;wP3[EBU`1OC5VD Xa?p S4[NS28;Y[꫙,T1|n;+/ʕj\\,E:! t4.T̡ e1 }; [z^pl@ok0e g@GGHPXNT,مde|*YdT\Y䀰+(T7$ow2缂#G֛ʥ?q NK-/M,WgxFV/FQⷶO&ecx\QLW@H!+{[|{!KAi `cm2iU|Y+ ި [[vxrNE3pmR =Y04,!&0+WC܃@oOS2'Sٮ05$ɤ]pm3Ft GɄ-!y"ӉV . `עv,O.%вKasSƭvMz`3{9+e@eՔLy7W_XtlPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-!pO[Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 -_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!!Z!theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ'( theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]# ~ *  2 hB9%)/H579@CFIOW"\_DaAg%pt|I_y ϓ xeF~Z\]_`abdefhijlmnpqrtuwxz{|~G @4>qIXan`}a?Fkx~[^cgkosvy}5q;Pw˜mНeÞ~XXXXXX8@0( ? B S  ? OLE_LINK1#'  S\y.$2$%%x(|(//223388~::L;P;AA|CC ~k; 4Z6;9jQX^hdI v_ )$Q,7Rxh +>FȞno6^GMAGlaqH&WMŘx?sMFe+NlD RR?RD=PJ[UsFuuZ<[4VX\ "Vc>s@Vfb6ky.io qnq*vh^`OJQJo(hHhhhhhhhhh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`hH...h  x ^ `xhH.... h   ^ `hH ..... h  X^ `XhH ...... h x^x`hH....... h p8H^p`8hH........ h `^``hH.........h hh^h`hH.h 88^8`hH.h L^`LhH.h   ^ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h xLx^x`LhH.h HH^H`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh P^`Po(hH..h ^`hH...h x^`xhH.... h  ^`hH ..... h  X@ ^ `XhH ...... h  ^ `hH....... h 8x^`8hH........ h `H^``hH.........88^8`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo  ^ `OJQJo(hH  ^ `OJQJo(hHxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHoHH^H`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHohHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`CJOJQJhH) ^`hH) 88^8`hH) ^`hH() ^`hH() pp^p`hH()   ^ `hH. @ @ ^@ `hH.   ^ `hH.h hh^h`hH.h P^`PhH..h ^`hH...h x^`xhH.... h  ^`hH ..... h  X@ ^ `XhH ...... h  ^ `hH....... h 8x^`8hH........ h `H^``hH.........hhh^h`OJQJo(hHh P^`PhH..h ^`hH...h x^`xhH.... h  ^`hH ..... h  X@ ^ `XhH ...... h  ^ `hH....... h 8x^`8hH........ h `H^``hH.........^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh hh^h`hH.h 88^8`hH.h L^`LhH.h   ^ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h xLx^x`LhH.h HH^H`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH. ^`o(.hhhhhhhhh^`B*OJQJo(phhHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHhh^h`o(hh^h`o(.0^`0o(..0^`0o(... 88^8`o( .... 88^8`o( ..... `^``o( ...... `^``o(....... ^`o(........h88^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHohHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJo(hHh P^`PhH..h ^`hH...h  x ^ `xhH.... h   ^ `hH ..... h  X^ `XhH ...... h x^x`hH....... h p8H^p`8hH........ h `^``hH.........h^`B*OJQJo(phhHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHQ^`Qo(Q^`Qo(.Q^`Qo(..Q^`Qo(... Q^`Qo( .... Q^`Qo( ..... Q^`Qo( ...... Q^`Qo(....... ^`o(........ hh^h`o(hH.5 hh^h`o(hH. 0^`0o(hH.. 0^`0o(hH... 88^8`o(hH .... 88^8`o(hH ..... `^``o(hH ......  `^``o(hH.......  ^`o(hH........h^`OJQJo(hHhTT^T`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh$ $ ^$ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhdd^d`OJQJo(hHh44^4`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHohHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`hH...h  x ^ `xhH.... h   ^ `hH ..... h  X^ `XhH ...... h x^x`hH....... h p8H^p`8hH........ h `^``hH.........h^`B*OJQJo(phhHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHhxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHohHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH hh^h`5CJOJQJ^Jo(hH ^`hH) 88^8`hH) ^`hH() ^`hH() pp^p`hH()   ^ `hH. @ @ ^@ `hH.   ^ `hH.hh^h`o(.088^8`o(.p0p^p`0o(..@ 0@ ^@ `0o(... xx^x`o( .... HH^H`o( ..... `^``o( ...... P`P^P``o(....... ^`o(........h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH hdI.ioD Ro6^Gv_7; * !QX?Rnqq6kVX\FuuZ?sMWMJ[UNaqH<[ "Vc0 0e+NAGVf )6;,> +>FQ,  t26 |*Tb&t&hD(vpj|Hb                                                                                    t26 |*Tb&t&hD(vpj|Hb          :                                                                         ] "G(@l . =Tqj=g7k hw "7sxuFw5hyOi:uc ; x"u@#O#,V%Y!&/y&'})'Gk'T*y+%-&[-X`-+/f00c0W@1!4{5K64n6C7795:j=:} =I>UN>Z>OBC4E]E{FgmGu&HpHb~H,GJ3K4BMyNQR]RSSYT TgTzT,V/yVl WnWX XQ(XcXRv\~\H]^yU^_ _T``a;a{aibfYccd 6efA,fAfVgpg@ifNjOlZ]lXo8pgIpTq^q iqB-s/tuxFy9Uyjyzqzzz |~Z~kUm (^_$XB_/Td_&&qw1nGVl*U`6ow&dz&p;]mt V4La}>9m8%+*b2\I-jydVPe0BqM(oABkBd}ik=&~zwR]n;2}1E_8,yE kJ YpE2&%F*vWaUF; p:_s~z<\2` )3]tyX#E{ r+&6V(Ea4H/M&408ZXR4-_P:*Kx3 =OnyJ ?nY(1h:'KXo^ pr@'|~X@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3 *Cx Arial? *Cx Courier New5Tahoma;WingdingsACambria Math"qhdFpW5pW5n24 3QHP ?S2!xx ,5Ad Hoc Session of the Joint IOC-WMO Steering Group on Charles SunPeter Pissierssens                           Oh+'0 , HT x   '8Ad Hoc Session of the Joint IOC-WMO Steering Group on Charles Sun Normal.dotmPeter Pissierssens2Microsoft Macintosh Word@@RO&j@<Ht@<Htp ՜.+,D՜.+,D hp  &',Dept. of Commerce / NOAA / NESDIS / NODC5W 6Ad Hoc Session of the Joint IOC-WMO Steering Group on Title 8@ _PID_HLINKS'AT$n\+mailto:Loic.Petit.De.La.Villeon@ifremer.frB Umailto:%6d%61%74%68%69%65%75.%6f%75%65%6c%6c%65%74@%64%66%6f-%6d%70%6f.%67%63.%63%61!n Fmailto:%6b%69%7a%75@%70%6f%6c.%67%70.%74%6f%68%6f%6b%75.%61%63.%6a%70EcWhttp://listes.ifremer.fr/sympa/editsubscriber/gosud/gael.alory@legos.obs-mip.fr/reviewN\>mailto:%4d%65%69%6c%69%6e.%43%68%65%6e@%6e%6f%61%61.%67%6f%76-http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/index.php  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FZ HtData 1TableWordDocument8*SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObj` F Microsoft Word 97-2004 DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8